Does reunification matter? Differences in the social connection to tribe and tribal enrollment of American Indian fostered and adopted adults

Ashley L. Landers, Amy A. Morgan, Sharon M. Danes, Sandy White Hawk - Children and Youth Services Review

Abstract

Studies of American Indian adults who were separated from their families of origin during childhood by foster care and/or adoption are emerging. This study fills a gap within the literature by exploring differences in social connection to tribe and tribal enrollment among reunified and non-reunified American Indian adults (n = 129). Grounded in identity theory, this study utilized data from the Experiences of Adopted and Fostered Individuals Project. Social connection to tribe was significantly higher for those who reunified (M = 70.0) than for those who had not (M = 42.0) (U = 689.50, p < .001). The overall ordinary least squares regression model was statistically significant (R2 = 0.150, F(7,121) = 3.05, p < .01) and reunification was a statistically significant factor associated with social connection to tribe (β = 0.28, p < .01). The chi-square test revealed the relationship between reunification and tribal enrollment was statistically significant, χ2(1, n = 129) = 14.01, p < .001. Reunified participants were more likely to be enrolled. The overall logistic regression model was statistically significant (χ2(7) = 19.97, p < .01) and reunified participants were 8 times more likely to be enrolled (OR = 8.73, 95% CI = 2.51, 30.35). Reunification remains a pressing priority, as fostered and adopted individuals are “welcomed home” across tribal communities.