Child Care and Protection System Reforms

Social welfare sector reform is increasingly common, particularly in transitional countries in Central and Eastern Europe.  Increasing attention has been paid to the development of preventive community based child and family welfare programs that would, in coordination with health and education programs and social assistance, provide a range of support for vulnerable families.   

Displaying 21 - 30 of 1062

Azorondu, A. Abigail, Adeniyi Ayomide, Somoye Adeyinka E., Couple Favour A., et al.,

This article reviews global evidence on the impacts of institutional care versus family-based alternatives and examines how these findings inform foster care reform in Ogun State, Nigeria. It synthesizes research from 2009–2025 to identify key developmental outcomes, implementation lessons, and policy priorities for transitioning away from institutional care.

Centre for Relational Care,

This report explores relational practice in out-of-home care in New South Wales, Australia, highlighting the importance of strong, trusting relationships between children, families, carers, and practitioners for children’s healing and well-being. It finds that although practitioners value relational work, system pressures—such as administrative requirements and compliance demands—often limit their ability to prioritize meaningful human connections.

U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office,

Este informe de antecedentes para la campaña global para la reforma del cuidado de la niñez y la adolescencia explica por qué los niños deberían crecer en familias y describe los cambios necesarios para fortalecer los sistemas de atención en todo el mundo.

U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office,

يسعى†الميثاق†العالميّّ†لإصلاح†رعاية†الأطفال†إلى†تعبئة†الجهود†لإصلاح رعاية†الأطفال†وتحسنيها،†مع†التركيز†بشكل†خاصّّ†على†©†1®†تقديم†الدعم لتقوية†الأسر†ومنع†الانفصال†غير†الضروريّّ،†©†2®†ضمان†وجود†رعاية بديلة†آمنة†وحاينة†ضمن†إطار†

Justin Rogers, Aisling Ledwith, Florence Martin, Enrique Restoy, and Caroline Rose,

In 2024, the 1st Global Ministerial Conference on Ending Violence Against Children (VAC) brought together 103 governments to make formal commitments to prevent and respond to VAC. This review analyses the pledges announced at the time of the conference, while acknowledging that some governments may have subsequently refined or expanded their commitments, as noted in the limitations.

Natia Partskhaladze & Hugh Salmon ,

This chapter, in the book Children and Family Social Work, reviews the reform of children’s care systems in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, tracing the historical reliance on large-scale residential institutions under communism and the subsequent shift toward community-based alternatives after the Soviet Union’s collapse. While institutionalization has significantly declined and community services have expanded, challenges remain in funding, workforce development, and preventing family separation while protecting children from harm.

Md. Golam Azam, Muhammad Mamunur Rashid, and Md. Abdul Mazid,

This qualitative case study examines the challenges and opportunities of alternative childcare services in Bangladesh, finding a growing demand for care options but significant gaps in quality and coordination. Key issues include inadequate emotional and psychosocial support, shortages of trained caregivers, weak monitoring systems, and social stigma, highlighting the need for stronger investment, capacity building, and a more child-centred approach.

Charles Simbarashe Gozho, Taruvinga Muzingili, Shumirai Muchuchu, and James Dominic Shalom Sithole,

This study examines the early stages of deinstitutionalization in Zimbabwe, finding that progress is hindered by inconsistent processes, limited workforce capacity, and resistance from institutional stakeholders. It highlights the need for clearer guidelines, stronger training, and better support systems to enable effective transitions from institutional to family-based care.

Jeremy Shiffman, Innocent Kamya, Adam D. Koon, et al.,

This article examines how national care systems for orphans and vulnerable children in Cambodia, Uganda, and Zambia are governed, drawing on case studies and a review of existing research. It highlights the gap between strong policy commitments and weak on-the-ground implementation, pointing to historical, political, and capacity-related factors that hinder effective care and protection.