In her work on the interconnected systems of mass incarceration and child welfare, Dorothy Roberts points out a pattern of institutionalized harm that strikes not at the atomic individual, but at the connections between individuals. Similarly, Ross and Solinger draw attention to ways that the state devalues and destroys family bonds within marginalized communities as a central example of reproductive injustice. In order to understand this pattern of injustice, a framework is needed that exceeds the logic of individual rights and harms and allows for the identification of harms that target the connections between people. This form of harm can be understood as kinship violence. It has distinct characteristics and constitutes a key aspect of racial and colonial oppression. In response to this violence, Ross and Solinger argue for a right to parent. This idea raises questions about possible limits or misappropriations by right-wing fathers’ rights and parental rights groups, the risks of protecting abusive or neglectful parents, and the limitations of a rights framework for opposing kinship violence. A carefully articulated feminist right to parent is a useful but incomplete framework, and such a right should be understood as part of a larger field of “kinship justice.”