Over­com­ing Chal­lenges to Eval­u­at­ing Child Wel­fare Pro­grams

Urban Institute

This recent webi­nar pre­sent­ed by the Urban Insti­tute and spon­sored by the Annie E. Casey Foun­da­tion explored approach­es to strength­en­ing eval­u­a­tion in child wel­fare ser­vices to more rapid­ly and prac­ti­cal­ly doc­u­ment what works.

It is based on a new series of briefs enti­tled From Evi­dence to Impact: Strength­en­ing Eval­u­a­tion in Child Wel­fare Ser­vice, which aims to helps facil­i­tate a more vig­or­ous dis­cus­sion of how to rapid­ly build evi­dence of what works in child wel­fare services.

The session high­light­ed strate­gies used in three states — Con­necti­cut, New Jer­sey and Wash­ing­ton — to strength­en the plan­ning, design and imple­men­ta­tion of eval­u­a­tions. Key take­aways included:

  • Agen­cies need more capac­i­ty and staffing to con­duct and use eval­u­a­tions effectively.
  • Fed­er­al eval­u­a­tion fund­ing is lim­it­ed and mis­aligned — greater, broad­er invest­ment is need­ed for capacity-building.
  • Small or spe­cial­ized pro­grams require flex­i­ble eval­u­a­tion meth­ods beyond stan­dard models.
  • Alter­na­tives to ran­dom­ized tri­als can bal­ance equi­ty con­cerns with effec­tive evaluation.
  • Eval­u­a­tion should be built into pro­gram design from the start — not added later.
  • Sus­tained eval­u­a­tion requires long-term com­mit­ment and con­sis­tent lead­er­ship communication.
Watch Overcoming Challenges to Evaluating Child Welfare Programs on YouTube.